I think its no secret that im not a big friend of boosters. But as we all know they will be part of the game from now on. So there are some people who like the boosters and some who don´t like them at all. It´s Daniels Part now to find the "right middle" on this. I was thinking about a limitation on booster stars per Tournament. So you should be allowed to set 30-40-50 stars for a tournament (different numbers for 250, 500, masters, grand slam). Please vote and let me know what you think about it!? And sorry if my english is not perfect at all...
At first, I didn't understand your suggestion and didn't see the reason behind it. But at a second reading and thought it seems to be a really nice idea. You have to use your cards at the minimum level that you need, in order to spare points for the higher rounds of the tournament. A low level player may win the first 2-3 rounds using huge cards, but he won't be able to use anymore cards later on. The conclusion is that this will prevent users from sacrificing their season and accumulating the entire year boosters, only to play the entire Wimbledon, for example, only with Epic and Legendary cards in an attempt to win it. Horst, please let me know if I understood your logic correctly.
Thats what i was thinking about... But another reason was to also limit the real money spent on this game because if we leave the game like that, there will be two parts: The Top 20 who spent huge amounts of money to win and the rest who has really no chance to compete on a high level... Also this limitation would add a "tricky level" to the game because you have to think about how to spent your boosters...
I thought something like that: You can reach a limit of packages each season Tell me what do you think
i think limit stars boosters in one tournament : junior and future: no boosters challenger: 10 stars boosters or no boosters atp250: 30 stars atp500: 40 stars atp1000: 50 stars grand slam 60 stars or first 3 rund no boosters in any tournament
